Does the 30% ruling remain applicable with a new employment contract?

Can you apply the 30% ruling for a new employee if their previous employer also did and the five-year period has not yet expired? It is possible under certain conditions, but make sure to pay close attention to the three-month period.

30% ruling

Employees recruited from abroad who perform work in the Netherlands can, under certain conditions, make use of the so-called 30% ruling. If they are allowed to apply this ruling, 30% of the salary – with a maximum of € 73,800 (2025) – can be paid out net. The 30% ruling applies for a maximum of five years.

Recruited from abroad

One of the conditions for applying the 30% ruling is that the employee lived outside the Netherlands for more than 16 of the 24 months prior to the employment. Furthermore, this should be more than 150 kilometers from the nearest point of the Dutch border.

Note! There are more conditions. Be sure to get informed by our advisors.

Leonie Pongers
Leonie Pongers Payroll tax specialist
Specialist in the field of payroll taxes
Payroll taxes, the best part! My team and I help clients find ways to save money on employee compensation. Giving presentations on my expertise, both internally and externally, also energizes me. Connecting with clients and colleagues to solve (international) issues is what drives me most!
Contact us

New employment?

What does it mean if an employee wishes to join you as a new employer during the term of the 30% ruling? Can you apply the ruling if the original five-year term has not yet expired?

Three-month term

Yes, you can. But only if you and the employee jointly request it and there is no more than three months between the end of the previous employment and the start of the new contract.

Note! As a new employer, you must also be able to demonstrate that all conditions for the 30% ruling are met.

But not longer

The application of the three-month term is strict, as ruled by a court. An employee unsuccessfully asked the court to continue the 30% ruling. The three-month term was exceeded in his case because the recruitment process was postponed several times. The postponement was caused by the employer, not the employee, but the court did not see this as a reason to extend the term. Consequence: the new employer was not allowed to apply the ruling.

Tip! Are you hiring a new employee for whom the previous employer applied the 30% ruling? Always consider the three-month term!

Read more about cross-border personnel or have questions? Feel free to contact us.